2) Picks
If you want us to provide picks, would you prefer to see:
Selections from a variety of handicappers
One handicapper or some kind of consensus

3) Handicapping Tools
With regards to handicapping tools, do you like to see:
A limited number of features with proven predictive value
A wide array of tools, some of which may be experimental

4) Research
As far as research articles go, do you feel we should:
Publish the full data arising from the research
Skip the details, get to the point, and build a tool/pick engine around successful research

5) Community
Is having a more interactive site important to you? Which would you prefer:
Yes, have message boards
No, skip the forums, have an expanded Q+A feature

6) References
Would you like to see us recommend/review:
Sportsbooks: Yes No
Handicappers: Yes No
Books about Handicapping: Yes No

7) Services
Would you like to see us offer:
Proxy service for Las Vegas Handicapping Contests: Yes No
Downloadable data files with current stats for use in your own programs: Yes No
Other Services?

8) Non-wagering oriented content
Would you be interested in other non-gambling features (free access):
Fantasy coverage: Yes No
General Interest articles: Yes No
New stats...missed tackles, pass direction/distance, blitz frequencies, etc Yes No
Regression/Correlation studies: Yes No

9) Site look and feel
As far as the site look, do you think we should use:
Large Type   Small Type
Mainly black and white   Lots of color
'Slick look'   Simple look

General Comments

What should we have more of?

What features can we discontinue?

Would you recommend TMW to a Friend?

Will you consider resubscribing for 2005?

Any Additional Comments?

How did you hear about TwoMinuteWarning.com?

Your Name (optional)